The History of Artificial Intelligence
From Early Foundations to Agentic AI
Governor House IT Initiative Programme
Quarter 4 - Prompt Engineering Assignment
Date: October 29, 2025
Presentation Agenda
- Introduction to Artificial Intelligence
- Early Foundations (1940s-1970s)
- Classical AI Era (1980s-1990s)
- Modern AI Renaissance (2000s-2010s)
- How Large Language Models Work
- Major Breakthroughs Enabling LLMs
- The LLM Revolution (2017-2023)
- Agentic AI Era (2023-Present)
- Current Landscape and Future
- Conclusion and Key Takeaways
SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION
What is Artificial Intelligence?
Definition:
The science and engineering of creating intelligent machines that can perform tasks typically requiring human intelligence.
Key Capabilities:
- 🧠 Learning and reasoning
- 💬 Natural language understanding
- 👁️ Visual perception
- 🎯 Problem-solving and decision-making
- 🤖 Autonomous action
Why Study AI History?
Understanding Evolution = Better Implementation
- Learn from Past Failures: AI winters and overhyping
- Appreciate Current Capabilities: How we got here
- Predict Future Trends: Where we’re heading
- Make Informed Decisions: Strategic AI adoption
- Understand Limitations: What AI can and cannot do
AI Evolution Timeline Overview
1950s: Birth of AI (Turing Test, Dartmouth Conference)
1960s-70s: Early Optimism & First AI Winter
1980s: Expert Systems Boom
1987-93: Second AI Winter
1990s-2000s: Machine Learning Renaissance
2012: Deep Learning Revolution
2017: Transformer Architecture
2022: ChatGPT & Mass Adoption
2023+: Agentic AI Era
SECTION 2: EARLY FOUNDATIONS (1940s-1970s)
Pre-AI Era: Theoretical Foundations
1940s - The Mathematical Groundwork
- 1943: McCulloch & Pitts - Artificial neurons model
- 1948: Claude Shannon - Information theory
- 1949: Donald Hebb - Hebbian learning
Key Insight:
“Intelligence could be described precisely enough that a machine could simulate it”
1950: The Turing Test
Alan Turing: “Computing Machinery and Intelligence”
The Imitation Game:
- Can a machine think?
- If it can fool a human judge, it demonstrates intelligence
- Still relevant benchmark today
Turing’s Question:
“Can machines think?” → “Can machines do what we (as thinking entities) can do?”
1956: Birth of AI - Dartmouth Conference
The Founding Moment of AI as a Field
Organizers:
- John McCarthy (coined “Artificial Intelligence”)
- Marvin Minsky
- Nathaniel Rochester
- Claude Shannon
Bold Claim:
“Every aspect of learning or any other feature of intelligence can in principle be so precisely described that a machine can be made to simulate it”
Early AI Programs (1957-1960)
Logic Theorist (1956)
- First AI program
- Proved mathematical theorems
- Created by Newell & Simon
General Problem Solver (1957)
- Attempted universal problem solving
- Influenced by human problem-solving
Perceptron (1958)
- Frank Rosenblatt’s learning algorithm
- Foundation of neural networks
- Could learn from examples
1960s: Early Achievements
Major Developments:
- ELIZA (1964) - First chatbot by Joseph Weizenbaum
- DENDRAL (1965) - First expert system for chemistry
- Shakey Robot (1969) - First mobile robot with reasoning
- MYCIN (1972) - Medical diagnosis expert system
Problem: Overconfidence led to unrealistic expectations
First AI Winter (1974-1980)
Why Did AI Fail?
❄️ Computational Limitations
- Computers too slow and expensive
- Limited memory capacity
❄️ Lack of Data
- No internet, no big datasets
❄️ Overpromising
- Failed to deliver on bold claims
- Lost government and corporate funding
❄️ Fundamental Issues
- Combinatorial explosion
- Lack of common sense reasoning
SECTION 3: CLASSICAL AI ERA (1980s-1990s)
Expert Systems Boom (1980-1987)
The Golden Age of Rule-Based AI
Success Stories:
- XCON (1980): Configured computer systems at DEC
- Commercial AI: Market reached $1 billion
- Japan’s Fifth Generation: Massive government investment
How Expert Systems Worked:
IF condition1 AND condition2 THEN action
IF patient has fever AND cough THEN likely flu
1986: Backpropagation Returns
Rumelhart, Hinton & Williams Popularize Backpropagation
Breakthrough:
- Efficient training of multi-layer neural networks
- Gradient descent optimization
- Made deep networks theoretically trainable
Impact:
- Revived interest in neural networks
- Foundation for modern deep learning
- But still limited by compute power
Second AI Winter (1987-1993)
The Crash of Expert Systems
Failures:
- ❌ Brittle and hard to maintain
- ❌ Expensive specialized hardware obsolete
- ❌ Couldn’t handle uncertainty
- ❌ Required constant manual updates
Funding Dried Up:
- Government cuts research budgets
- Corporate disillusionment with AI
- “AI” became a negative term
SECTION 4: MODERN RENAISSANCE (1990s-2010s)
Statistical AI Emerges (1990s)
Shift from Symbolic to Statistical Approaches
Key Developments:
- Machine Learning gains traction
- Probabilistic reasoning
- Support Vector Machines
- Random Forests
Philosophy Change:
From “Program intelligence” to “Learn intelligence from data”
Landmark Achievements (1997-2011)
1997: Deep Blue Defeats Kasparov
- IBM’s chess computer wins world championship
- Brute force + some AI
2005: DARPA Grand Challenge
- Autonomous vehicles navigate desert
2011: IBM Watson Wins Jeopardy!
- Natural language processing victory
- Combined multiple AI techniques
2012: The Deep Learning Revolution
AlexNet Wins ImageNet Competition
Why It Matters:
- 15.3% error rate (previous best: 26%)
- Used GPUs for training
- Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs)
- Proved deep learning works at scale
Result: Deep learning becomes dominant paradigm
Deep Learning Success (2012-2016)
Breakthroughs Across Domains:
- Computer Vision: Image classification, object detection
- Speech Recognition: Near-human accuracy
- Game Playing: AlphaGo defeats world Go champion (2016)
- Machine Translation: Neural MT surpasses phrase-based
Key Enabler: GPUs + Big Data + Better Algorithms
SECTION 5: HOW LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS WORK
What Are Large Language Models?
Definition:
Sophisticated prediction engines that generate text by predicting the next most likely word (token) based on patterns learned from massive datasets.
Not Intelligence, But:
- Extremely advanced autocompletion
- Statistical pattern matching
- Learned representations of language
Key Insight: They don’t “understand” - they predict patterns
The Fundamental Process: Tokens
Token-by-Token Generation
What is a Token?
- A piece of text (word, subword, or character)
- ~0.75 words on average
- Modern LLMs: 50K-100K token vocabulary
Example Tokenization:
Text: "ChatGPT is amazing!"
Tokens: ["Chat", "G", "PT", " is", " amazing", "!"]
How LLMs Generate Text
Step-by-Step Process:
- Input Processing: Convert prompt to tokens → embeddings
- Context Analysis: Self-attention analyzes relationships
- Prediction: Generate probability for each possible next token
- Selection: Choose token based on strategy (greedy/sampling)
- Iteration: Add selected token and repeat
- Stopping: Continue until end-of-sequence or max length
Key Point: Each token depends on ALL previous tokens
LLM Training: Two Phases
Phase 1: Pre-training (Learning Language)
- Massive datasets (trillions of tokens)
- Next-token prediction task
- Self-supervised learning
- Costs: $1M - $100M+
- Duration: Weeks to months
Phase 2: Fine-tuning (Alignment)
- Instruction following
- Human feedback (RLHF)
- Safety and bias reduction
- Task specialization
Key Configuration Parameters
Temperature (0.0 - 1.0)
- 0.0: Deterministic, focused (math, code)
- 0.7: Balanced (conversation)
- 1.0: Creative, random (poetry)
Top-K / Top-P
- Limit token choices for quality control
- Prevent unlikely/nonsensical outputs
Context Window
- 4K to 2M+ tokens
- Determines how much text model can “see”
- Longer = more expensive
LLM Capabilities
What LLMs Excel At:
✅ Language understanding and generation
✅ Pattern recognition and completion
✅ Translation and summarization
✅ Code generation
✅ Question answering
✅ Creative writing
✅ Few-shot learning
LLM Limitations
Critical Limitations:
❌ Hallucinations: Generate plausible but false information
❌ No Real Understanding: Pattern matching, not comprehension
❌ Knowledge Cutoff: Only knows training data
❌ No Learning: Cannot update from corrections
❌ Context Limits: Finite memory window
❌ Biases: Reflect training data biases
❌ No Verification: Cannot check own outputs
10 Essential Questions About LLMs
From MIT Sloan Review:
- How do LLMs decide when to stop generating?
- Can LLMs update from corrections immediately?
- How do LLMs “remember” past conversations?
- How do they answer questions after training cutoff?
- Can we force LLMs to use only provided documents?
- Can we trust LLM citations?
- Is RAG still necessary with long contexts?
- Can hallucinations be eliminated?
- How to efficiently check LLM outputs?
- Can we guarantee identical answers?
Answer to most: Partially, with proper engineering
SECTION 6: MAJOR BREAKTHROUGHS ENABLING LLMs
“Attention Is All You Need” - Vaswani et al.
Revolutionary Changes:
- ❌ Eliminated sequential processing (RNNs/LSTMs)
- ✅ Parallel processing of entire sequence
- ✅ Self-attention mechanism
- ✅ 10-100x faster training
Impact:
Foundation for GPT, BERT, T5, and all modern LLMs
The Self-Attention Mechanism
Key Innovation: Words Attend to All Other Words
How It Works:
- Each word gets Query, Key, Value representations
- Calculate attention scores between all word pairs
- Weighted sum produces contextualized representation
Result:
- Captures long-range dependencies
- Understands context bidirectionally
- Parallelizable computation
Formula: Attention(Q,K,V) = softmax(QK^T/√d_k)V
Breakthrough #2: Scaling Laws (2020)
Kaplan et al.: “Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models”
Key Discovery:
Model performance scales predictably with size, data, and compute
Power Laws:
- Bigger models = Better performance
- More data = Better performance
- More compute = Better performance
Strategic Impact:
- Justified billion-dollar training runs
- Led to 100B+ parameter models
- “Scale is all you need” philosophy
Model Size Evolution
The Exponential Growth:
- 2018 - GPT-1: 117M parameters
- 2019 - GPT-2: 1.5B parameters (13x)
- 2020 - GPT-3: 175B parameters (117x)
- 2023 - GPT-4: ~1.8T parameters (10x+)
- 2024 - Gemini Ultra: 2T+ parameters
Moore’s Law for AI:
Model sizes doubling every ~6 months
Breakthrough #3: Transfer Learning
Pre-train, Then Fine-tune Paradigm
Two-Stage Training:
Stage 1: Pre-training
- Learn general language understanding
- Massive unlabeled datasets
- Expensive but done once
Stage 2: Fine-tuning
- Adapt to specific tasks
- Smaller labeled datasets
- Fast and cheap
Efficiency Gain: 1 expensive pre-training → Many cheap fine-tunings
Breakthrough #4: Hardware Revolution
GPUs Transform AI Training
NVIDIA CUDA Ecosystem:
- 2007: CUDA platform enables GPU computing
- 2012: First deep learning on GPUs
- 10-100x speedup over CPUs
Specialized AI Hardware:
- Google TPUs: Tensor Processing Units
- A100, H100, B200: Latest AI accelerators
- Training Clusters: Thousands of GPUs connected
Cost Impact: What took years now takes weeks
Breakthrough #5: Massive Datasets
Data is the New Oil
Dataset Evolution:
- Wikipedia: 6M articles, structured knowledge
- CommonCrawl: Petabytes of web data
- Books3: Literary and long-form content
- C4: 750GB of clean, filtered text
Data Quality Matters:
- Deduplication removes redundancy
- Filtering improves quality
- Language identification enables multilingual models
- Toxicity removal enhances safety
Breakthrough #6: Attention Mechanisms
Evolution of Attention:
2014: Bahdanau Attention (for RNNs)
- Solved translation bottleneck
- Encoder-decoder attention
2015: Luong Attention
- Global vs. local attention variants
2017: Self-Attention (Transformer)
- Words attend to themselves
- Multi-head attention
- Parallelizable and scalable
Impact: Made long-range understanding possible
Breakthrough #7: Mixture of Experts (MoE)
Sparse Activation for Efficiency
Concept:
- Multiple specialized sub-networks (experts)
- Gating network routes inputs
- Only activate relevant experts
Benefits:
- ✅ Larger capacity without proportional compute
- ✅ Specialized experts for different domains
- ✅ 10x model size with 2x compute cost
Examples: GPT-4, Switch Transformer, Grok
Breakthrough #8: Advanced Training Techniques
Algorithmic Innovations:
- Adam Optimizer: Adaptive learning rates
- Layer Normalization: Stable deep network training
- Gradient Clipping: Prevent exploding gradients
- Mixed Precision: FP16/FP32 for speed
- Learning Rate Scheduling: Cosine annealing, warmup
Result: Reliable training of 100B+ parameter models
Breakthrough #9: RLHF (Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback)
Aligning AI with Human Intent
Three-Step Process:
- Supervised Fine-tuning: Train on quality examples
- Reward Modeling: Learn human preferences
- PPO Training: Optimize using reward model
Impact:
- Better instruction following
- Reduced harmful outputs
- More helpful and honest responses
Key to: ChatGPT’s success and user-friendliness
Breakthrough #10: Software Ecosystem
Tools That Enabled the Revolution
Deep Learning Frameworks:
- TensorFlow (2015): Production-ready
- PyTorch (2016): Research-friendly
- JAX: High-performance computing
LLM Tools:
- Hugging Face: Pre-trained model hub
- OpenAI API: Democratized access
- LangChain: Application development
Impact: Lowered barriers to AI development
SECTION 7: THE LLM REVOLUTION (2017-2023)
BERT (2018) - Google
- Bidirectional understanding
- Masked language modeling
- State-of-the-art on 11 NLP tasks
GPT-1 (2018) - OpenAI
- 117M parameters
- Autoregressive generation
- Proved transformer scaling potential
Impact: Transformers dominate NLP research
2019: GPT-2 Controversy
1.5B Parameters - “Too Dangerous to Release”
OpenAI’s Concerns:
- Could generate convincing fake news
- Potential for misuse
- Staged release strategy
Reality Check:
- Eventually fully released
- Concerns were somewhat overstated
- Sparked important safety discussions
Lesson: Balance innovation with responsibility
2020: GPT-3 Breakthrough
175B Parameters - Emergence of New Capabilities
Surprising Abilities:
- Few-shot learning without fine-tuning
- In-context learning from examples
- Code generation (basis for Codex)
- Creative writing and reasoning
Industry Impact:
- Hundreds of startups built on GPT-3 API
- Demonstrated viability of large-scale models
- $10B+ investment in OpenAI
2021-2022: Multimodal and Specialized Models
Expanding Beyond Text:
CLIP (2021): Text-image understanding
Codex (2021): Code generation (GitHub Copilot)
DALL-E (2022): Text-to-image generation
Whisper (2022): Speech recognition
Trend: From narrow to general-purpose AI
November 30, 2022: ChatGPT Launch
The Moment AI Went Mainstream
Unprecedented Growth:
- 1 million users in 5 days
- 100 million users in 2 months
- Fastest-growing consumer app in history
Why It Succeeded:
- Free to use
- Conversational interface
- RLHF made it helpful and safe
- Accessible to non-technical users
Impact: AI became household term
2023: GPT-4 and Multimodal AI
GPT-4 - Most Capable Model Yet
Capabilities:
- Multimodal (text + images)
- ~1.8T parameters (estimated)
- Passes bar exam, AP tests
- Advanced reasoning
Other Developments:
- Claude (Anthropic): Constitutional AI
- Bard/Gemini (Google): Competing offerings
- LLaMA (Meta): Open-source alternatives
The Open vs. Closed Debate
Two Philosophies:
Closed/Proprietary (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google)
- ✅ Better safety control
- ✅ Monetization easier
- ❌ Less transparency
- ❌ Vendor lock-in
Open Source (Meta, Mistral, Stability AI)
- ✅ Transparency and reproducibility
- ✅ Community innovation
- ❌ Safety concerns
- ❌ Compute requirements
Current State: Hybrid approaches emerging
SECTION 8: AGENTIC AI ERA (2023-PRESENT)
What is Agentic AI?
From Reactive to Proactive Intelligence
Traditional LLMs (Reactive):
- Wait for user input
- Generate response
- No persistent state
- Human-directed
Agentic AI (Proactive):
- Autonomous planning and execution
- Tool use and external integration
- Persistent memory and context
- Goal-oriented behavior
Paradigm Shift: From chatbot to autonomous agent
Core Components of Agentic AI
1. Advanced Reasoning
- Chain-of-Thought (CoT)
- Tree of Thoughts (ToT)
- ReAct (Reasoning + Acting)
2. Tool Use
- Function calling
- API integration
- Code execution
3. Memory Systems
- Short-term (working memory)
- Long-term (user preferences)
- Context management
4. Multi-Agent Collaboration
- Role specialization
- Task delegation
- Coordinated workflows
Advanced Reasoning Techniques
Chain-of-Thought (CoT)
“Let’s think step by step”
- Break complex problems into steps
- Explicit reasoning trace
- Better accuracy on complex tasks
Tree of Thoughts (ToT)
- Explore multiple reasoning paths
- Backtrack when needed
- Select best solution
ReAct (Reasoning + Acting)
- Interleave thinking and doing
- Thought → Action → Observation loop
- Dynamic problem-solving
LLMs Can Now Use External Tools
Tool Categories:
- Information Retrieval: Web search, databases
- Computation: Calculators, code execution
- Communication: Email, messaging, APIs
- Creative Tools: Image generation, editing
- Business Systems: CRM, analytics, automation
Example:
{
"tool": "web_search",
"query": "latest AI developments 2024",
"num_results": 10
}
Multi-Agent Systems
Multiple AI Agents Working Together
Coordination Approaches:
- Orchestration: Central coordinator
- Peer-to-peer: Direct agent communication
- Hierarchical: Manager and worker agents
Benefits:
- Specialized expertise per agent
- Parallel task execution
- Emergent collaborative behaviors
Frameworks: AutoGPT, CrewAI, LangChain Agents
Prompt Engineering for Agentic AI
Context Engineering vs. Prompt Engineering
Prompt Engineering:
- How to ask (structure, tone, format)
- Instructions and constraints
- Output format specification
Context Engineering:
- What to show (documents, data, tools)
- RAG and knowledge bases
- Tool availability and integration
Best Practice: Combine both for optimal results
Mixture of Experts (MoE) in Agentic AI
Modern Models Use Specialized Experts
How MoE Works:
- Router analyzes input
- Selects relevant experts (typically 2 out of 8-64)
- Activates only chosen experts
- Combines expert outputs
Prompt Engineering for MoE:
- Front-load domain signals
- Use clear, specific vocabulary
- Separate mixed-domain tasks
- Match examples to target domain
Current Agentic AI Models (2024-2025)
Leading Systems:
GPT-4 Turbo & GPT-4o
- Advanced function calling
- Code interpreter
- Vision capabilities
Claude 3.5 Sonnet & Claude 4
- Long context (200K+ tokens)
- Constitutional AI approach
- Tool use mastery
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- Multimodal integration
- Million+ token context
- MoE architecture
Grok 4 (xAI)
- Multi-agent architecture
- Real-time data integration
Real-World Agentic Applications
Business Automation:
- Customer service automation
- Report generation and analysis
- Content creation workflows
- Code development and debugging
Personal Productivity:
- AI personal assistants
- Research and learning companions
- Creative collaboration
- Task planning and execution
Scientific Discovery:
- Automated literature review
- Experimental design
- Data analysis pipelines
- Hypothesis generation
Challenges in Agentic AI
Technical Challenges:
- ⚠️ Reliability and error propagation
- ⚠️ Computational costs
- ⚠️ Latency in multi-step workflows
- ⚠️ Context management complexity
Safety Concerns:
- ⚠️ Autonomous action risks
- ⚠️ Security vulnerabilities
- ⚠️ Privacy and data access
- ⚠️ Goal misalignment
Solution: Robust oversight and safety measures
SECTION 9: CURRENT LANDSCAPE & FUTURE
Leading AI Models Comparison (2025)
Model Leaderboard (by capabilities):
| Model |
Parameters |
Context |
Strengths |
| GPT-5 |
~2T (MoE) |
128K |
Reasoning, coding |
| Gemini 2.5 Pro |
~2T (MoE) |
2M |
Multimodal, long context |
| Claude 4 |
~400B |
200K |
Safety, helpfulness |
| Grok 4 |
~500B (MoE) |
128K |
Real-time data |
| DeepSeek-V3 |
671B (37B active) |
64K |
Cost-effective |
Trend: MoE dominates, context lengths growing
Key Players in AI
Major Organizations:
🏢 OpenAI: GPT series, ChatGPT, DALL-E
🏢 Google DeepMind: Gemini, AlphaGo, AlphaFold
🏢 Anthropic: Claude, Constitutional AI
🏢 Meta: LLaMA, open-source focus
🏢 Microsoft: Copilot integration, Azure AI
🏢 xAI: Grok, Twitter integration
🏢 Mistral: European, open-source commercial
Market Size: $200B+ by 2030 (projected)
Ethical Considerations
Critical Issues:
1. Bias and Fairness
- Training data reflects societal biases
- Mitigation through careful curation and testing
2. Privacy and Security
- Data used for training
- Potential information leakage
3. Job Displacement
- Automation of knowledge work
- Need for workforce adaptation
4. Misinformation
- Deepfakes and synthetic media
- AI-generated disinformation
5. Environmental Impact
- Energy consumption of training
- Carbon footprint concerns
AI Safety and Alignment
Ensuring Beneficial AI
Technical Approaches:
- RLHF for value alignment
- Constitutional AI principles
- Red-teaming and adversarial testing
- Interpretability research
Governance:
- AI regulations (EU AI Act)
- Industry self-regulation
- International cooperation
- Academic oversight
Open Challenge: Aligning AGI if achieved
Future Directions (2025-2030)
Near-Term Innovations:
- Efficiency Improvements: Smaller, faster models
- Better Reasoning: Causal and logical thinking
- Persistent Memory: Long-term learning
- Multimodal Integration: Seamless cross-modal understanding
- Edge Deployment: Running LLMs locally
- Embodied AI: Physical world integration
The Path to AGI?
Artificial General Intelligence
Definition:
AI systems matching or exceeding human cognitive abilities across all domains
Current Gaps:
- Common sense reasoning
- Causal understanding
- Physical world grounding
- True learning and adaptation
- Consciousness (?)
Timeline Predictions:
- Optimists: 2027-2030
- Moderates: 2035-2040
- Skeptics: Decades or never
Reality: Uncertainty remains high
SECTION 10: CONCLUSION & KEY TAKEAWAYS
The AI Journey: Key Milestones
1950s: Birth of AI concept (Turing, Dartmouth)
1960s-70s: Early optimism and first winter
1980s: Expert systems boom and bust
1990s-2000s: Statistical ML renaissance
2012: Deep learning revolution (AlexNet)
2017: Transformer architecture
2020: Scaling laws validated (GPT-3)
2022: Mass adoption (ChatGPT)
2023+: Agentic AI emerges
Lesson: Progress isn’t linear - expect ups and downs
Major Paradigm Shifts
1. Symbolic → Statistical (1990s)
- From hand-coded rules to data-driven learning
2. Shallow → Deep (2010s)
- From feature engineering to deep neural networks
3. Narrow → General (2020s)
- From task-specific to general-purpose models
4. Passive → Agentic (2023+)
- From reactive chatbots to autonomous agents
Each shift: Unlocked new capabilities and applications
Key Breakthroughs Summary
Top 10 Breakthroughs:
- ⚡ Transformer architecture (2017)
- 📈 Scaling laws discovery (2020)
- 🎓 Transfer learning paradigm
- 🖥️ GPU/TPU hardware revolution
- 📚 Massive dataset creation
- 👁️ Attention mechanisms
- 🧩 Mixture of Experts (MoE)
- 🔄 RLHF and alignment
- 🛠️ Software ecosystem (PyTorch, HuggingFace)
- 💰 Economic models (APIs, cloud)
Result: Convergence enabled modern AI
Understanding LLMs: Essential Points
What They Are:
- Sophisticated pattern matching systems
- Token-by-token prediction engines
- Trained on massive text datasets
What They’re Not:
- True understanding or consciousness
- Infallible or factually perfect
- Capable of learning from single interactions
Best Practice:
- Clear prompting and context
- Verification of critical outputs
- Understanding limitations
- Appropriate use cases
Agentic AI: The New Frontier
From Chatbots to Agents:
Key Capabilities:
✅ Autonomous planning and reasoning
✅ Tool use and system integration
✅ Multi-step task execution
✅ Persistent memory and learning
Current State:
- Early but rapidly advancing
- Real business applications emerging
- Safety and reliability improving
Future: Foundation for next AI revolution
Implications for Society
Opportunities:
- 🚀 Productivity multiplication
- 🎓 Personalized education
- 🔬 Accelerated scientific discovery
- 🏥 Improved healthcare
- ♿ Accessibility for all
Challenges:
- 💼 Job market disruption
- ⚖️ Ethical and legal questions
- 🌍 Digital divide concerns
- 🔒 Privacy and security
- 🌱 Environmental impact
Need: Balanced, thoughtful approach
Strategic Takeaways for Implementation
For Organizations:
- Start with clear use cases: Don’t use AI for AI’s sake
- Invest in infrastructure: Data, compute, talent
- Prioritize safety and oversight: Human-in-the-loop
- Build responsibly: Ethics and privacy first
- Stay informed: Rapid evolution requires continuous learning
For Individuals:
- Learn prompt engineering
- Understand capabilities and limits
- Develop AI-assisted workflows
- Stay critical and verify outputs
The Road Ahead
What We Know:
- AI will continue advancing rapidly
- Applications will expand dramatically
- Society will need to adapt
What’s Uncertain:
- Timeline to AGI (if ever)
- Ultimate capabilities and limits
- Long-term societal impact
What’s Certain:
- AI is transforming our world
- Understanding the foundations matters
- Responsible development is critical
We’re still in early days of this revolution!
Key Resources and References
Academic Papers:
- “Attention Is All You Need” (Vaswani et al., 2017)
- “Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models” (Kaplan et al., 2020)
- “Language Models are Few-Shot Learners” (Brown et al., 2020)
Educational Resources:
- MIT Sloan: “How LLMs Work” article
- Panaversity: Prompt Engineering tutorials
- Deep Learning by Goodfellow, Bengio, Courville
Online Platforms:
- OpenAI Playground
- Google AI Studio
- Anthropic Console
- Hugging Face
Questions for Discussion
Technical:
- How do attention mechanisms differ from previous approaches?
- Why did scaling laws change AI development strategy?
- What makes agentic AI different from traditional LLMs?
Strategic:
- What industries will AI transform most in next 5 years?
- How should organizations prepare for AI adoption?
- What skills remain uniquely human?
Ethical:
- How do we ensure AI remains beneficial?
- What regulations are needed?
- How do we address job displacement?
Thank You!
The History of Artificial Intelligence
From Early Foundations to Agentic AI
Key Message:
We’ve journeyed from symbolic logic to neural networks, from reactive systems to autonomous agents. Understanding this history helps us build a better AI future.
Remember:
- AI development isn’t smooth - expect setbacks
- Each breakthrough built on previous work
- Current capabilities are remarkable but not magic
- Responsible development is everyone’s responsibility
Let’s shape the future of AI together!
Detailed Timeline: 1950-1980
| Year |
Event |
Significance |
| 1950 |
Turing Test |
Conceptual foundation |
| 1956 |
Dartmouth |
AI field founded |
| 1957 |
Perceptron |
Neural network learning |
| 1965 |
DENDRAL |
First expert system |
| 1969 |
Perceptrons book |
Showed limitations |
| 1974-80 |
First AI Winter |
Funding dried up |
Detailed Timeline: 1980-2010
| Year |
Event |
Significance |
| 1980 |
XCON |
Commercial expert system |
| 1986 |
Backprop |
Neural network training |
| 1987-93 |
Second AI Winter |
Expert systems fail |
| 1997 |
Deep Blue |
Chess victory |
| 2006 |
Deep learning |
Hinton’s breakthrough |
| 2011 |
Watson |
Jeopardy! win |
Detailed Timeline: 2012-Present
| Year |
Event |
Significance |
| 2012 |
AlexNet |
Deep learning proves out |
| 2017 |
Transformer |
Architecture revolution |
| 2018 |
GPT-1, BERT |
Foundation models emerge |
| 2020 |
GPT-3 |
Scaling breakthrough |
| 2022 |
ChatGPT |
Mass adoption |
| 2023 |
GPT-4 |
Multimodal + agents |
| 2024+ |
Agentic AI |
Autonomous systems |
Compute Growth in AI Training
Exponential Increase:
- AlexNet (2012): 1-2 GPU-days
- GPT-2 (2019): 100 GPU-days
- GPT-3 (2020): 3,640 GPU-years
- GPT-4 (2023): ~100,000 GPU-years (est.)
Cost Evolution:
- $10,000s (2012) → $100M+ (2023)
Trend: 10x increase every 2 years
Economic Impact of AI
Market Size:
- 2023: $150B
- 2030 (projected): $1.5T+
Investment:
- Venture capital: $50B+ annually
- Corporate R&D: $100B+ annually
Job Impact:
- Displaced: 300M jobs (WEF estimate)
- Created: 97M new jobs
- Net: Transformation, not elimination
AI Ethics Frameworks
Key Principles:
- Fairness: Reduce bias and discrimination
- Transparency: Explainable AI decisions
- Privacy: Data protection and consent
- Accountability: Clear responsibility
- Safety: Prevent harmful outputs
- Beneficence: Maximize positive impact
Implementation: Ongoing challenge across industry
Thank You for Your Attention!
Questions?
Contact Information:
- Governor House IT Initiative Programme
- Quarter 4 - Prompt Engineering
- Assignment Submission: https://forms.gle/aJiPAykB8YGdsd7R8
Resources:
- GitHub: github.com/panaversity
- Course Materials: Governor House IT Programme
END OF PRESENTATION